Is there a connection between war and when housing cycles recover in the greater economy? The guns versus butter argument revolve around the theory that any society has limited resources, and we have to choose wisely how we deploy them.
While food (butter) is a necessity of life, we also need to protect (guns) the food we have otherwise someone stronger will take away from us the food we have produced. Therefore, while it is good to grow food, it’s better to have an opportunity to consume the food we grow without threat. We avoid being threatened by showing outsiders the ability to protect what we have.
Only since the end of WW II has a housing formed as a stall-worth in the Guns N’ Butter paradigm. When the GI’s came home, they needed housing and jobs. Building housing created both housing stock and jobs. Financing housing was necessary to make it all work. And it worked well.
Is it true that when wars end housing flourishes?
The United States, for most of its short history, is consistently in a state of either winding up for war or winding down from war. To my knowledge, there is not a single generation that has escaped this fact.
Some people who fought in the revolutionary war were still living at the beginning of the War of 1812. Some born during the time of this war were living during the U.S. Civil War in the 1860s. Some born during the Civil War fought in the Spanish-American War of 1898.
These conflicts are followed by World War I (1914-18), World War II (1939-44), The Korean War (1950-3), Vietnam (1965-74), Gulf War (1990-), Afghanistan (2001-) and the War on Terror (2001-).
Are we winding down from war today? If the answer is yes, then expect housing to flourish as domestic consumption takes center stage, and fewer national resources are utilized around the globe to combat the enemy from afar.